The Situation
A division of vice presidents from around the country, each running a national organization inside its own vertical. Structurally, they were a team. In practice they rarely worked a hard problem together, because the calendar and the org chart both pulled the other way.
Their own description of the starting point was blunt. One of them puts it on camera: there was room for improvement in how the group worked and engaged together. The discussions that mattered were the ones nobody was having in front of each other.
What We Did
A series of sessions rather than a single offsite, because the gap was about how the group worked over time, not about one unresolved decision.
- Build the foundation. The first session worked on the teamwork, the foundational principles, and how the group engaged with each other, before any live business issue was put on the table.
- Put real issues in the room. The second session took actual business problems and hard topics, the ones that had been handled one to one, and worked them as a group.
- Commit and come back. Later sessions turned the conversation into named initiatives, with each person taking a piece, a deadline in weeks rather than quarters, and a review of progress at the next session.
What Changed
These are the team’s own observations, recorded at the end of their sessions.
- The uncomfortable became discussable. People grew comfortable with things that would have been uncomfortable before, and the candor, the discussions, and the challenges were all things the group was not seeing at the start of the program.
- Hard topics got worked as a team. Real business issues and hard topics, taken on candidly by the group rather than escalated or avoided.
- Accountability and coaching appeared between peers. Teams holding each other accountable, peer-to-peer coaching, and quieter voices starting to speak up in the group forums.
- Commitments carried a name and a date. Each person leaving with a piece to deliver in the next two to three weeks, tied to the number the division was chasing.
- Progress got reviewed, not assumed. Action items taken away, then brought back to the table to check progress, on the business and on the team.
In Their Own Words
Six leaders, recorded at the end of their own sessions. No preparation and no script, which is why several of them start by describing what the group was like before.
In Their Own Words
Dave Bezzant
Vice President, T-Mobile for Government
Hard Topics, Handled as a Team
“Today we took real business issues and hard topics and we candidly and eloquently worked as a team to help solve some of the most critical items.”
Darin Jorgensen
Director of Enterprise Sales, West, T-Mobile for Business
Comfortable With the Uncomfortable
“What we saw was a lot more of people being comfortable with things that would have been uncomfortable before.”
Cheryl Keeler
Accountability and Peer Coaching
“The teams are starting to work together in a way that is superior to any other way they have done before. We are holding each other accountable. I am seeing peer-to-peer coaching.”
Michelle Worley
Real Issues, Discussed With Respect
“We are learning so much more about each other, and are really able to talk about real business issues with candor and with respect and with collaboration.”
John Plotz
Action Items That Come Back
“We walk away with action items and then come back to the table, review, see our progress, not just in what we are doing for our business but what we are doing as a team.”
Roopi Crowley
Everyone Leaves With a Piece
“Each of us has a piece, four takeaways from this week's session, and each has to deliver in the next two to three weeks to help us with our number.”
Your Team Could Be the Next Case
Start with the free assessment, measure the whole team with the Diagnostic, or go straight to the 90-Day Accelerator. Each step credits the next.